The Placenta Blog


One of the common arguments against placentophagia, or consumption of the placenta, is that it is an act of cannibalism. I disagree for the following reasons:

  1. Cannibalism is the eating of human flesh. Flesh is defined as being muscle and fat; placenta is neither.
  2. Cannibalism, by definition, is consumption of the flesh of someone or something that has been recently killed. Placentas, again, do not qualify.
  3. Arguments against placentophagia state that we are not supposed to consume anything that comes from our own body. Except, we feed our infants milk produced from our breasts, which is perfectly designed for that purpose. So is the placenta perfectly designed for consumption by the mother.

Obviously, placentophagia is not cannibalism. But what about the argument that placentophagia goes against God’s will? That one, my friends, is a religious question and I am not a theologian.

However, Anna Marie Zalesak has studied philosophy and Catholic theology, and has written a great argument in support of placentophagia for Catholics. She agreed to let me share her thoughts here, but wanted me to mention that it is a work in progress, and may not be her final thoughts on the matter.

My argument on placentophagia is far from being complete, but I thought I would share my thoughts so far. I have perused the Catechism of the Catholic church looking for the teaching on cannibalism and found nothing. I would like to know if anyone is aware of an official source approved by the Church regarding the morality of cannibalism. Not that I need it proven to me that cannibalism is immoral, but because I would like to see and understand the principles of the argument, to see if the same may be applied to placentophagia.

In my perusal of the Catechism, I read through the article on the 5th commandment, Thou shalt not kill, because I thought that any mention of cannibalism would come under that category. In my reading I saw that all the sins listed against this commandment (murder, suicide, abortion, euthanasia, unjust anger, hatred, vengeance…) have this in common - they entail a fundamental disrespect for the sacredness of human life, even those sins that don’t even involve killing (hatred, anger etc.). It seems to me that cannibalism, the way we generally think of it, ie. killing people for the sake of eating them, is wrong for this same reason - fundamental disrespect for human life. Human personhood, which is a reflection of God, is violated.

Cannibalsim can be divided into to categories - (a) killing a person in order to eat their flesh and (b) eating the flesh of a person who has died on their own. Let us consider (b) in which the person is not maliciously killed, as this more closely pertains to placentophagia. There was the case of the soccer team that crashed in the Andes mountains. The survivors ate the flesh of those who had died either in the crash or b/c of freezing to death. There was no malicious intention, in fact their intention was the preservation of their own lives, which is a moral good. However, since the morality of a human act depends upon three factors: the object (act itself), the intention, and the circumstances (see Catechism of the Catholic Church, line 1755), we cannot say that their cannibalism was perfectly okay. Their intention may have been good, and their circumstances were indeed mitigating, but the intrinsic evil of consuming dead human flesh remains unchanged. The personhood of those who had died was in some way violated because their bodies were not properly respected. We cannot judge the souls of those who ate the flesh, but we can say that the act itself was wrong, even though the circumstances were mitigating.

Let us assume that placentophagia is an instance of the latter kind of cannibalism in which human flesh is eaten but there is no homicide. Let us consider the three factors that will determine the morality or immorality of placenta consumption. First, the object, or act itself, which is consumption of the placenta by the mother of a newborn child. The death of the child is not a necessary component of this act, either by the mother’s hand or natural causes. The organ, which was once vital to the child during gestation, has outgrown its usefulness and is discarded by the child’s body and then the mother’s body. It is no longer part of either human body and therefore cannot be said to be the flesh of a person, although it was human in origin. The placenta is not the flesh of a dead person, and therefore its consumption cannot be called cannibalistic. Placentophagia in no way violates the personhood of a human being made in the image and likeness of God. This makes the object of placenta consumption morally indifferent, and not morally evil.

Proceeding then with the knowledge that the act is morally indifferent, let us examine the other two conditions to see if they contribute to the moral goodness or evil of placentophagia.The intention of the human mother in consuming the placenta is to regain her own health. She takes it as a kind of natural medicine to help her heal from childbirth. The placenta provides her with proteins, vitamins, minerals and hormones that ease her post partum period. Benefits to the mother include decreasing the risk of post partum depression, preventing excessive bleeding, increasing her breastmilk supply, reducing post partum iron deficiency, and improving her quality of sleep. The respect for and preservation of life is a moral good, therefore the mother’s intention works towards making her placentophagia a good act. It is possible, I suppose, for there to be an evil intention in placenta consumption, although I do not know what that could be. But if that were to happen, the act would be made immoral by the evil intention.

Lastly, we shall consider the circumstances of the act of placentophagia. If they are the usual circumstances, ie, a pregnancy reaching its completion at birth with the placenta no longer needed by the child’s body, then there is no harm done to either mother or child. If however, the placenta were to be harvested from the mother’s body while it still played a vital role for the child, that would make it an evil act because the circumstance involves the killing of the child. But in the usual circumstances of placentophagia neither the mother nor the baby are harmed in any way.

In conclusion, placentophagia is not cannibalism because it does not involve killing, nor the consumption of flesh which belongs to a deceased person. It does not present an affront to the dignity of the human person. Nor is placentophagia morally evil as long as the intentions and circumstances are either good or morally indifferent.

What do you think?

13 Responses to “Is eating placenta cannibalism? And, what about God?”

  1. Faylyn

    One simple thought… If God didn’t intend for mammals to consume the placenta then why do cats do it out of instinct?

  2. Heather Clisby

    I couldn’t find a contact email on this site so this will have to do. We are highlighting this post on BlogHer.com’s Life page:

    http://www.blogher.com/blogher-topics/life

    If you have any questions, just email me. Thanks!

  3. Jodi Selander

    That’s awesome, Heather, thank you! I spotted it. I’m honored! :)

  4. Monique

    Faylyn, your reasoning is deeply flawed. Male cats also eat their young, should we, as fellow mammals, do the same???

  5. Elisheva

    There is a very clear divide between beasts and humans in the Bible. God made us different than beast therefore we should not act like them. The only mention of placenta consumption in the Bible is not a positive on: Deuteronomy 28:57. It is a description of what sinful humans will do in times of crisis.

  6. Sarah

    Elisheva that verse from Deuteronomy is referring to what happened time and time again during siege and strife back then; either because of starvation in captivity or because of the desire that her children would not be taken and enslaved, these mothers hid their afterbirths so no one would know a child had been born, and ate the babies. The evil is that the children were murdered and consumed, nothing to do.with the eating of the placenta.

  7. No, It’s NOT Cannibalism | Postpartum Peace

    [...] can access the original post at http://blog.placentabenefits.info/index.php/2011/11/is-eating-placenta-cannibalism-and-what-about-go...

  8. Eating Placenta | Elise Cohen Ho, Naturally Yours

    [...] usually ritualistic eating of human flesh by a human being.”

  9. Antoine

    Good day! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate!
    He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this write-up to him.
    Fairly certain he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  10. Postpartum Health: Benefits of the Placenta | Yavapai County Birth Circle

    [...] Encapsulation is on the rise with the placenta capsules giving you a consistent flow of oxytocin, making you feel good and encouraging your uterus to return to its normal size. Many studies have been published but for North America this is still a fairly new concept; that being said, with the many potential benefits and no negative side affects, why not? [...]

  11. You’re Planning on Eating WHAT??? | The Journeys of a Nomadic Pagan

    [...] of someone or something that has been recently killed. Placentas, again, do not qualify.”[2]

  12. Kristine

    So if cannibalism is eating the flesh of something or someone recently killed then by your flawed definition I can tie someone up and carve pieces from them and ingest them without committing cannibalism as long as the person is alive. And if flesh is only muscle and fat then I can cut off and eat someones ear or gouge out and eat their eye without committing cannibalism. Dead or Alive and regardless of what body part it is all cannibalism. The placenta is a part of the baby. We “amputate” the placenta after the baby is born. If you take a placenta and test it for DNA it will contain the babys DNA there for it is part of a human but has been cut off.

  13. Dave Megan

    It only depends to the belief of a person. Let us just respect each other.

Leave a Reply

Author: Jodi Selander


Follow me on TwitterFollow Me on Pinterest

PBi Blogger: Carmen Calvo


Subscribe to Blog

Favorites

natural products for moms in Las Vegas
Kim Trower, midwife Las Vegas
Hypnobirthing Las Vegas
April Kermani, midwife Las Vegas
pediatric and maternity chiropractor in Las Vegas
Advertise with PBi
Proudly powered by WordPress. Theme developed with WordPress Theme Generator.
Copyright © The Placenta Blog. All rights reserved.